Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Belfort

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Belfort

Mike Belfort (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable fighter (no fights), limited google hits; prod declined NeilN 03:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:BIO. Major google hits are from forums and non-reliable sources. Carlosguitar 03:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Delete A good sign of a non-notable article is when the only link provided is a MySpace. No multiple, third party sources asserted on this person. Spellcast 03:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• Not speedy' Speedy is for no assertion of notability. Inadequate assertion is for AfD. I've declined the speedy. The article will go very smoothly in the normal 5 days. DGG (talk) 03:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, two different roads to the same outcome. Spellcast 03:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete not notable and has unreliable sources. Oysterguitarist 04:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete What is sadder than a fighter with no fights? NawlinWiki 16:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The only thing sadder than a fighter with no fights is an article on Wikipedia about one. Burntsauce 18:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. When he gets a professional fight, I'd say he becomes eligible for an article. --Agamemnon2 23:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.