Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle School Movies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Middle School Movies
Delete as per WP:Note. A movie list; Interestingly these movies are not yet filmed! First movie is going to be filmed in this summer. A google search failed to return any substantial entry. I found a PDF [1] file that talks about Middle School Movies but that doesn't establish its notability. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 12:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note - By WP:NOTE I tried to indicate WP:MOVIE as well. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 12:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like some Jenkins hi-jinks. The link is for a list of movies appropriate for middle school audiences (Balto 3, Chicken Run, Beauty and the Beast). In this case, it looks like an extended daydream created either by a 6th grader or, just as likely, one of his parents. "Austin gets away as one of the coolest kids in school" in the sequel-- in spite of this article, I hope. Mandsford (talk) 12:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Some little kid is planning on messing around with his parents' camcorder next summer vacation. Sadly, crap like this cannot be speedied, although it's close enough to G12/spam that it would probably qualify. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I do strongly agree with you about its Speedy nomination. But, I had some very bad experiences in past where it happened that almost nonsense stuff became notable! Even just two days back I was about to tag an article for speedy which failed to clarify even its context [2]. Later, in AfD discussion it was identified (with the help of Russian WP) that it's a school and notable enough to have an article here. That's why I prefer AfD over Speedy (unless it's very close to nonsense) so that at least we can have a chance to discuss on the issues before we delete them. Cheers. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 11:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know, and my comment was not a criticism of your nomination, but a remark on the annoying loophole that A7 doesn't apply to physical media of any kind: if this kid's movies were on youtube, they could be speedied, but if he's planning on showing them at home in his VCR (or whatever), A7 doesn't technically apply. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I do strongly agree with you about its Speedy nomination. But, I had some very bad experiences in past where it happened that almost nonsense stuff became notable! Even just two days back I was about to tag an article for speedy which failed to clarify even its context [2]. Later, in AfD discussion it was identified (with the help of Russian WP) that it's a school and notable enough to have an article here. That's why I prefer AfD over Speedy (unless it's very close to nonsense) so that at least we can have a chance to discuss on the issues before we delete them. Cheers. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 11:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Snowball delete per Andrew Lenahan.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
