Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Raymond Mintz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Raymond Mintz

non notable biography (contested prod). Natalie 21:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete - Delete, but not because of not notable prod, The article is def not POV, the comment, "A leader among leaders" leads me toward the NPOV claim. THe also has no sources, It appears to be all original researc, if you can call it that. Def Delete.Chris Kreider 21:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: NPOV means neutral point of view which is what we want. POV means point-of-view which is what sentences like "leader among leaders" are. --Dhartung | Talk 08:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable QuiteUnusual 21:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable student, nothing out of the ordinary. Emeraude 23:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Must be deleted 'cause this person is non-notable, and makes encyclopedia like uncyclopedia. Daniel5127 (Talk) 06:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete On the talk page of this article an unnamed proponent of the article contested the PROD saying: "Michael Mintz is an important campus figure at our University and an entry serves to inform the student body about his history" (emphasis added). The appropriate place to inform the student body about Mr. Mintz's history would be on a University website or the website of the student group(s) he leads. For now, there's no indication that anyone outside the University would learn much about this fellow, but it sounds like he is destined for greater things and he will have an impact on the world around him in the future. And maybe sometime in the future there will be documentary source material ripe for the creation of a new Wikipedia article on Mr. Mintz and his wonderful future accomplishments. But today is not that day. Best of wishes to Mr. Mintz.OfficeGirl 07:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.