Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Jou

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Jou

Michael Jou (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non notable person C5mjohn 01:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - In text information on awards won, etc, asserts notability. -Wooty Woot? contribs 02:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - as a particularly silly hoax. Previous keep vote was based on very, very lazy googling ;) -Wooty Woot? contribs 04:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No sources to verify the awards won. Only source given is a picture. DarkAudit 02:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Hoax The picture is of a kid in a Northwestern shirt with no other context. In 1985, this kid would barely be out of diapers. DarkAudit 03:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Additional Article's original editor's only edits were to this article. DarkAudit 12:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as likely hoax. [http://www.norris.northwestern.edu/staff.php There's a Michael Jou at Northwestern, but he works for the student union (and is probably a student himself). --Dhartung | Talk 04:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, more than likely WP:BALLS, ultimately violates WP:V. --Kinu t/c 06:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Stoic atarian 07:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable. Tim.bounceback(review me! | talk | contribs | ubxen) 12:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per the nominator, looks like WP:BALLS and violates verifiability policies. Burntsauce 16:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment It's strongly believed that this article is a hoax, so why is it still here? DarkAudit 13:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.