Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Emig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenix ʕ 23:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Emig

As with Andrew J. Armstrong, Abram Emanuel Schell, James H. Smith, and R.W. Smith, although interesting, this is an ancient obituary about a non-notable person. Medtopic 21:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --Nobunaga24 01:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ian Manka Talk to me! 17:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. NN. BlueValour 17:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As per nom. Aren't these supposed to be closed after 5 days? whats the hold up?--Crossmr 17:24, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. They are only closed if enough editors have discussed the article to produce a fair concensus. Where, as here, there is insufficient discussion the AfD is relisted. BlueValour 17:30, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.