Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melech AZA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:N and WP:V. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Melech AZA

Melech AZA (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete as there are no WP:RS indicating this club meets WP:ORG. Possibly a CSD A7 candidate, but brought here for consensus. This actually is a subgroup/chapter of the organization Aleph Zadik Aleph, but I see no notability outside of the context of the parent organization. The way this reads, it might be a WP:COI article, unless the statement that they currently "rock" is sourceable... --Kinu t/c 05:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - non-notable chapter per WP:ORG. MER-C 13:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There isn't anything in the article to indicate that it meets WP:ORG. Nor is there anything that asserts its notability, either. If reliable sources could be found, then it would be reason to keep, but there are none cited, so delete. --SunStar Nettalk 13:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as Melech is a well known chapter (basically, I disagree with Kinu and Mer-C ). Many people from around the country, as well as the world, know who/what Melech is. Although the article does need some cleaning up, it will definitely be fixed up if it doesn't get selected for deletion. CPTGbr 02:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment: Unless reliable sources are added indicating this notability, the article will likely be deleted. If you can add any, I suggest you do it now. A claim of "many people... know who/what Melech is" is meaningless without the references to back up not only that assertion, but also that it is more notable than other chapters of AZA. --Kinu t/c 19:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.