Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie schurr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:19, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Melanie schurr

Prod by Kinu contested. With apologies to Kinu, and because I think he well stated the reasons for which deletion is appropriate, I'm stealing his justification from prod: "Non-notable author: three low-ranked books listed on Amazon, all published by Lulu Press (self-publishing house) or Lotus Books (subject's own press). Few relevant search results for "melanie schurr"+author. Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Also suspected that article is created by subject." Userfy (if user so desires) and delete. Joe 06:39, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per my original PROD; userfy optional. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy if it can be shown that the author is the subject, delete outright if not. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 11:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unsourced vanity article. Doesn't really look like a misplaced user page, but the subject/author can userfy it if she likes. Robin Johnson 13:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as nn/vanity per Mr. Kinu (et al.) Kuru ^talk 05:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't seem to reach encyclopedic notability. Deli nk 21:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.