Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mckelvey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The Result was Keep Non-Admin Closure --Pookeo9 (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] McKelvey

Well i saw this article and thought it wasnt that he was a good horse but i dont know if he should be in wikipedia no offense to people who like him. What do you think? Keep or delete? All thoughts are welcomed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pookeo9 (talk • contribs) 23:23, April 8, 2008

• Keep Anything second in Grand National will be keep as will have plenty of WP:RS Here is one from a Times article and anotherfrom AOL. SunCreator (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Was a good horse in the National Hunt racing—until he was killed in a fall last weekend during his most recent Grand National run. Small article at the moment (as are many NH horse articles), but as noteworthy as many other race horses we've got. MeegsC | Talk 23:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - passes my notability requirement with ease, its a well-kept stub ..--Cometstyles 10:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per Suncreator. I am a bit worried about this becoming a coatrack against animal euthanasia, or running horses inappropriately. Stifle (talk) 19:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.