The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete for the same reason I prodded it...spam. Akradecki 22:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete as spam. These are notable sites, certainly, but this isn't even the start of a decent article. Title wouldn't even make a good readirect. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:59, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. What's the controversy with this deletion anyway? This should have stayed on the proposed deletion route. —C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.