Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Hogan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 01:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Matthew Hogan

Vanity, doesn't meet WP:BIO, only editor is Hoganma, article spams 24 categories so far. Quale 18:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom; more evidence of notability would change this, of course. Tevildo 18:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy no evidence of notability, autobio.--Andeh 18:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete please don't userfy obvious vanity. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete appears to be just a vanity page without more evidence of notability. DrunkenSmurf 19:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Although I agree with Tevildo's caveat; I think it's possible. And suggest Hoganma receve *nice* comment on talk page re: autobio policy. Autobio articles seem to be a common newbie tendency. — Mike • 19:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. to me the biggest problem is that he seems to attempting to add himself to virtually EVERY cateogry going as a notable person - he's a nobody and I say that as a fellow nobody" --Charlesknight 21:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination, fails WP:BIO. Antandrus (talk) 23:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable; link reveals that he is Earlham '07. Good luck with his senior yeat; and we may need this article - some other time. Septentrionalis 20:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't demonstrate sufficient notability. Paul August ☎ 02:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Can't we speedy this -- no claim of notablility except the word "polymath". — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.