Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marmofecal cure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as patent nonsense, chemically and biomedically speaking. Also, someone could get into deep shit (pun not intended) for trying to synthesise it... —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-24 11:06Z

[edit] Marmofecal cure

Marmofecal cure (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod, but no comment by creator as to why. Article is unsourced and unverifyable, but claims notability. Zero ghits for "marmofecal" other than the article. Likely a hoax. Flyguy649^talk_contribs 02:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete A bunch of unreferenced marmoset shit. Edison 03:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. bibliomaniac15 03:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete cure for cancer, totally lacking in sources of any type, yep, it's marmoset scat. Pete.Hurd 04:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This one gave me a laugh. Someguy1221 04:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unreferenced and completely nonsensical (hydrogen chloride is a gas, not part of "an enzime" [sic]). Zetawoof^(ζ) 06:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment. HgS is also quite poisonous. Additionally, mixing with hydrochloric acid could form mercuric chloride, which is also...quite poisonous. Someguy1221 09:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.