Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marmadukiverse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Marmadukiverse

Marmadukiverse (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Utterly non-notable bordering on ridiculous neologism. Prod removed by author. JuJube (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

• delete non notable. hardly any ghits, let alone reliable sources. books and scholar turn up nothing, and seeing the subject matter, I doubt there is much written material on the subject. In the end, a NNN (non notable neologism) per nom. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as a failed dicdef. No widespreade usage of the term -- Whpq (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable neologism used on a single blog with little potential to be used elsewhere. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Crap! Non-notable article. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.