Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Penney 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. Johnleemk | Talk 06:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Penney

Recreated deleted material (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Penney). Allegedly, this fixes the problem with the last article, but not sufficiently notable even with the "fix." Since I was the last AfD proposer, however, I am uncomfortable speedy deleting it myself since there was a good faith at a fix. Still, my opinion is Speedy delete (as recreation of deleted material and as non-notable). I will also post CSD tags to those effect and let another admin decide the issue. --Nlu (talk) 03:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete as A7; (not G4) Segv11 (talk/contribs) 03:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep rgp82 - all info is accurate - many first time filmmakers on this, 16 January 2006
  • Strong keep lawtoo4 the information is accurate and the film The Right Way was a hit in Toronto and also played the Venice Film Festival
    • User only has two edits. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep pipergates yeah it can be verified 16 January 2006
  • Speedy keep filmfan665 - alot of filmakers who don't have the credentials this man has are in this database 16 January 2006
  • Delete, nn, sock puppet attack. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • You don't need to be logged in to edit so god only knows how many edits they may have
  • Weak Delete, non-notable bio. Googling for Mark Penney and his movie comes up with just over 100 hits, a lot of which are copies of Perry Enterprise's press release and what appears to be linkspam. Probably qualifies for speedy deletion: A-7 article. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 04:23, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. This person was writer and director for a feature length film that appeared at a major film festival and has an entry in the IMDB. That's good enough for me. (Shoos away sock puppets). Durova 04:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. Notable director. Per Durova. Cnwb 05:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, expand and clean up. My God, I'm voting the same as the talking hosiery! Has Hell frozen over yet? - Lucky 6.9 07:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Looks ok. enochlau (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep; while he's not particularly well known and while the preponderance of sock puppets makes me queasy, I'd ultimately have to agree with Durova: the film has an IMDB entry, has appeared at a major film festival and stars a sufficiently well-known actress (albeit one whose article needs a good sandblasting). And that's fine by me. Bearcat 19:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: this is not a speedy keep. A speedy keep can only happen if there are no votes to delete and the nominator withdraws, or the nomination was vandalism or disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Stifle 20:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete, speedy if possible as G4 repost. Sockpuppet invasion. Stifle 20:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep BrandonTheGreat - This is article should never been up to delete to begin with, 17 January 2006
    • User has six edits. - Mike Rosoft 22:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain, but due to the number of valid "keep" votes the article should not be speedily deleted. - Mike Rosoft 22:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Same vote as last time. The IMdb site lists absolutely everything in TV and Movies but doing so doesn't make it anymore notable. Atrian 04:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Young but up and coming director. No good reason to delete this. -- JJay 15:17, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.