Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnum Carnage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep by means of withdrawn nomination, author's arguments are valid. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Magnum Carnage
Doesn't seem to be a notable band, sources look somewhat iffy. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 21:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep- C'mon, TPH. I was going to properly add the references later. I created less than an hour ago. I think it's a notable band with decent media coverage, which has been provided in the article. Just because they're from Hawaii, doesn't mean they're not notable. Also, please forgive my English, but what does "iffy" mean? --Boricuaeddie 21:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that -- "Iffy" means unsure, doubtful. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll be double checking, just in case... --Boricuaeddie 22:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- The question isn't really too much in the sources, but rather in the notability. Some claims are made, but none of them seem to satisfy WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, it does. Criterion #1 says "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable... This includes includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries." The article has sources. Therefore, they clearly meet WP:MUSIC. --Boricuaeddie 22:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm still kind of unsure about the reliabilty of those sources, although I have shifted to wak delete. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understand what is your concern with them. This is a chart: reliable. This is the work of a published magazine: reliable, and helps them meet WP:MUSIC. Any more concerns? --Boricuaeddie 22:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see how the chart for one station is notable enough. The second one is okay, though. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understand what is your concern with them. This is a chart: reliable. This is the work of a published magazine: reliable, and helps them meet WP:MUSIC. Any more concerns? --Boricuaeddie 22:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm still kind of unsure about the reliabilty of those sources, although I have shifted to wak delete. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, it does. Criterion #1 says "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable... This includes includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries." The article has sources. Therefore, they clearly meet WP:MUSIC. --Boricuaeddie 22:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- The question isn't really too much in the sources, but rather in the notability. Some claims are made, but none of them seem to satisfy WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll be double checking, just in case... --Boricuaeddie 22:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that -- "Iffy" means unsure, doubtful. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
