Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mageba kaPhunga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. NTK 21:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mageba kaPhunga

I don't know if I'm doing the right here to nominate this to AfD, but I don't know what to do. All I can comprehend by the article is that someons son married his twin brother, or his father. or something else. What the article should be about I dont know. _→AzaToth 04:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. It's a crazy-sounding article, very poorly written, but he seems to be a historically-attested King of the Zulus. If so, it needs cleanup, not deletion. · rodii · 04:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup per rodii. Sandstein 04:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: The article needs to be modified so that it is clear who/what the subject is. Also the article's full title should be mentioned in the article. Finally, people's full names should be given the first time they are mentioned. -- Kjkolb 10:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletions. -- Humansdorpie 12:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - cleaned it up. Probably created by someone from a specific clan trying to prove descent from Zulu royal lineage, but a perfectly valid article. - Humansdorpie 13:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-04-6 13:12
• Keep, per Humansdorpie & Rodii. — mark ✎ 17:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep now that proper context has been given to the article. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Zululululululululululuofthelotuseaters. Heh, in all seriousness king of the zulus is a pretty notable title ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 23:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.