Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macey Baggett Wuesthoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Macey Baggett Wuesthoff

Seems to be a vanity page or advert. Robin Johnson 09:51, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Author of a book by a major publisher, listed on Amazon. Meets inclusion criteria at WP:BIO. But can we get rid of that scary picture? —Brim 10:37, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Sole contributor is User:Macey, so unless she's published something notable, it's WP:VAIN. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 10:41, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, one book published by a vanity press, does not meet WP:BIO.--nixie 10:43, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nixie. Endomion 16:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nixie. Gamaliel 19:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nixie --Quarl 21:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, her book on Amazon is ranked 1,707,893, there should be over a million other authors written about before her. Petaholmes, is Amber Quill Press a vanity press? I know they're only e-books, but they do claim to pay royalties. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:33, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
  • (I'm not sure how the Amazon sales rank works, but I believe if the Amazon sales rank of a book is N, there are far more than N books more popular than it --Quarl 23:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.