Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Liqing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as non-notable nancy ^(talk) 11:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ma Liqing

Ma Liqing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Is this assistant professor sufficiently notable? Based even on the list of publications, I don't think so. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 21:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable, no third-party sources.--Aervanath's signature is boring 21:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete GoogleScholar and GoogleBooks searches produce next to nothing. In general, I am inclined to cut a bit of an extra slack to scholars from non-Engslish speaking countries to avoid systemic bias. But we do need some positive evidence that the work of this scholar has substantially affected their field, and in this case none seems to be available. It is also true that it is rare for an Assistant Professor (in any country) to be academically notable. The bottom line is: fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 22:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.