Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MINT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, no one besides the nominator agrees with outright deletion, merging can always be done as an editorial decision by any interested party. - Bobet 09:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MINT

This is an article about a commercial product, which although popular, surely does not deserve its own page Lurker ^haver 10:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment — I'm unsure if this deserves a standalone article or not. If not, the content should probably be merged into Royal Bank of Scotland Group rather than being deleted. Mike Peel 10:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Mike Peel. Erechtheus 05:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep MINT dont trade or in any noticable way operate as "Royal Bank of Scotland MINT", and offer a not insignificant product range. Surely if MINT was not part of RBS it would warrant an entry... If this is to be deleated I think we'll have to reasses the inclusion of a whole range of "commerical products". Ian3055 23:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Evidence for the article meeting WP:CORP - Daily Mail Group article - Guardian article - Independent article - Times article (all links working as at posting time) Ian3055 23:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to Royal Bank of Scotland Group, do not keep. Does not appear to meet WP:CORP. Vegaswikian 17:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, also write article on Solo (online banking). --Petri Krohn 02:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.