Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Carter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Louis Carter

Non-notable person (original nomination) - Now the page has been changed and looks even more like a cut and paste of somebody's resume. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 13:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep & Wikify Needs to be verified that he is an executive of "several" large corporations that are claimed, yet not named. Need to verify notability of the "institute" he directs. If done, he is notable. Also need to guage notabiluty of his written "works".

If all this can be done, KEEP If not - Mark me down for Speedy delete as a NN/vanity/hoax. -- Librarianofages 02:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. I cannot find much indicating notability. Capitalistroadster 03:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, doesn't appear to be notable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, the company is not notable and the only claim to fame seems to be that he is one of three editors to a book about a study conducted by his own company --Peripitus (Talk) 12:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep & expand - his book listed in the article actually exists, and the Best Practice Institute appears to be a bona fide real org. But the article does need to be expanded to actually show notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whpq (talk • contribs)
  • Comment - I'm looking for sources, I'll post them here for comment, then put them in the article if it looks like it will be kept. here's one - 1 --PresN 14:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment - He was, apparantly, the VP of Research at Linkage 2(PDF) --PresN 15:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment - And he's still on their advisory board - 3 --PresN 15:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Comment - and on the advisory board for the SLC - 4 (horrible website btw) --PresN 15:14, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Pisses me off, after all that research, but while all the claims on the article can be verified, I think, he's not notable anyway. Bah. --PresN 15:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Too many weasel words means a weasel. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 20:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO. Not notable enough for inclusion. Scorpiondollprincess 13:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.