Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorna Morgan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No information was added (either in this discussion or in the article) to suggest that the subject meets WP:PORNBIO. – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lorna Morgan
I don't think this woman's notable. Fails WP:PORNBIO. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:PORNBIO. Xihr 18:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- How? I have doubts about whether this is a good faith comment. Epbr123 00:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Closing admin: See [1]. Xihr 01:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll ask again. How? Epbr123 21:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- How could a !vote explaining the reasoning for it possibly be in bad faith? You're being disingenuous here. Xihr 23:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- It can't. But how does that argument apply to your !vote? Epbr123 23:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I gave precisely as much reasoning in my vote to keep as you gave in your nomination for the AfD above. By your logic, you're admitting your nomination was in bad faith. You can't really mean that, can you? This Socratic method you use to engage in debate isn't working out very well. Xihr 23:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- It can't. But how does that argument apply to your !vote? Epbr123 23:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- How could a !vote explaining the reasoning for it possibly be in bad faith? You're being disingenuous here. Xihr 23:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll ask again. How? Epbr123 21:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Closing admin: See [1]. Xihr 01:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- How? I have doubts about whether this is a good faith comment. Epbr123 00:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not convinced that she is prolific enough in the big-bust genre. If Voluptuous Model of the Year and two time Plumper of the Year, Kerry Marie, isn't notable, I'm afraid Lorna Morgan isn't. Epbr123 18:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 22:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Don't know why. UnknownMan 22:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Vote recovered from unwarranted deletion by User:Picaroon. It is no one's place to remove other people's comments; the closing admin must take into consideration all votes. Higher quality votes with substance, of course, have more weight then non-quality votes, since AfD is not a vote. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 14:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Given that it featured on the Wiki blog planet, it is interesting to see that it being considered for deletion :) GerardM 21:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Could you provide a link to the blog entry that's featuring Lorna? Tabercil 03:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The article as it is written does not provide sufficient details to prove notability. Tabercil 03:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
