Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Lover (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Cbrown1023 23:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Little Lover

Little Lover (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Seems to be quite a while since the last AfD, and I guess this should be redisscussed rather then a CSD G4. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 17:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Whispering 01:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• Merge to High Voltage (Australian album).--Dakota 01:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with High Voltage. It was never a single and it isn't an album track of particular note. Capitalistroadster 02:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 02:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or include the salient detail in the album article under "trivia", maybe. My understanding of worthiness for articles is (it's quite simple): album, EP, or single, yes - not individual songs, regardless of notability thereof. Bubba hotep 13:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge -- into High Voltage (Australian album). Was never released as a single. - Longhair\^talk 00:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge, song isn't really notable on its own.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.