Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liselott Persson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 23:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Liselott Persson

Liselott Persson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable (at least outside of Sweden). I have been unable to find any English-language biographical information on her with which to expand this stub. Also, see comments here. Vbd | (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Support If it can't be expanded it should be scrapped, and I can't find anything on her in any of the foreign language wikipedias. Lord Pheasant 04:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 12:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Erling Persson. Although lack of English language sources should not preclude inclusion of the genuinely notable, the subject would not appear to be notable outside of having inherited father's shareholding. Ohconfucius 07:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, let's see, several non-trivial secondary sources, referenced i.a.w. WP:V, the only foot we have to stand on for deletion is I Don't Like It. I.a.w. the rules it should be Keep AlfPhotoman 01:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:BIO. A trivial mention in the Forbes rich list and a local paper reporting that does not provide any reliable sources of which the person the article is about is the subject. Nuttah68 13:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment being in the Forbes Rich List is only a little different to being listed in any other directory, which Wikipedia is not. We need better sources which attest to her notability. Ohconfucius 03:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.