Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Weltman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa Weltman

Lisa Weltman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete Non-notable, and not sourced. GreenJoe 03:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete As above, also note that she seems to have been added to {{United States presidential election, 2008 navigation}} despite the article saying she is only "considering" running, and of course, the fact that there is no evidence she is a serious candidate. -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 03:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, as above. Only news coverage is for the Congressional election, which she lost. Losing candidates are not automatically notable. --Dhartung | Talk 08:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Exploratory commitee for 2008 presidential election to represent a very notable party is not non-notable. --Oakshade 15:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Yes it is. Say you're in or not. Don't straddle the fence. GreenJoe 15:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• She gets less than 900 Google hits. Her presidential exploratory committee website is on Geocities. I see little, if any, non-trivial coverage. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 20:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment In order to call onesself a politician, would't you need to have won at least one election? --Infrangible 02:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.