Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liang Zhenpu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Philippe 02:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Liang Zhenpu

Liang Zhenpu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article (and the two that I'll list below as well) cite sources that are not independent from the practicing organization, and are in fairly and difficult-to-fix POV tone that read like advertising for the organization. Unless notability independently established, delete. --Nlu (talk) 17:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I am also listing the following related articles for deletion:

  • Keep A quick cursory search found many additional Web sources. Here are just a few: [1], [2], [3], [4], etc. There are literally thousands of sites mentioning these people. Obviously notable. The articles should be tagged but not deleted.Insearchofintelligentlife (talk) 02:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Sourced and notable. Further, editor proposing deletion has done so in bad faith, failing to take the few seconds it would have taken to notify the creator of this article, despite having been asked no fewer than four times to do this in future, over the past week. Badagnani (talk) 07:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
    • This shows that this keep vote is in bad faith. Notification is optional. If this voter wants notification to be made mandatory, the voter should propose it either in WT:AFD or a centralized discussion. Frankly, I think the voter's behavior is bordering on, if it is not outright, WikiStalking. --Nlu (talk) 13:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Per Insearchofintelligentlife. These articles are on notable subjects but they need to rewritten to be more encyclopedic in nature. The first sentence needs to say who these people are and why they are notable. And Nlu, although I think Badagnani should have assumed good faith, I think you are escalating accusations to an even worse level than he/she did.Nrswanson (talk) 13:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No notability established. Stifle (talk) 14:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep They are all notable disciples of Dong Haichuan, as established through a cursory search by numerous sources: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. victor falk 15:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.