Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's wrestle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was let's delete. Coredesat 05:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Let's wrestle

Let's wrestle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Tagged for notability since July. No sources given outside of the band's own website. Edited by SPAs, fails WP:OR and WP:V, obvious WP:VSCA, and so on. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete NN Tiptopper 01:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

I concur. This entry has been deleted at least once before for failure to meet the notability guidlines. No new sources have been added and no effort has been made to meet a variety of other Wikipedia guidlines. Id711 02:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as NN vanity page. Hal peridol 02:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Per notability (failed to assert even though the page has been tagged). - Rjd0060 03:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Yeah, non-notable.Alberon 11:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Lets Wrestle are a decent band it just needs to be aranged better —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King of Clay (talk • contribs) 17:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -RiverHockey 23:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Let's not Non-notable, link to their 'MySpace' set off the alarm, lack of sources and they don't seem to have released anything besides some digital downloads and some 7" singles (from a low-key publisher).Someone another 00:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.