Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lego Arctic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Maxim(talk) 15:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lego Arctic
Expired prod but I'm sure the Lego WikiProject will want to give its two cents on the subject. Pascal.Tesson 00:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, as all the other Lego themes have their own articles (see List of Lego themes) and some of them are pretty nice Lego Pirates, showing that an encyclopedic treatment of these lines is possible. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Expand I think it just need some work. Has anyone notified the concerned WikiProject? Maybe they can fix this article. --Lenticel (talk) 00:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I have dropped a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lego. I assume this is the right thing to do. I know nothing about sources for Lego. Peace --TreeKittens 01:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Please note WP:N "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" Is this product notable? I see no evidence of it in the article. MarkBul 02:23, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless sources can be found to establish notability and ensure that the article content is verifiable per WP:N and WP:V respectively. Sorry. TreeKittens 01:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT a lego catalogue. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 05:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
