Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Key
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. The editors have seen through the hazy POINT accusations and seem to have concluded that this is not up to scratch. I'm not giving any weight to the POINT=>keep thing since I don't see how this is experimentally disruptive. DGG accurately points out only a single media citation in the article. -Splash - tk 22:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lauren Key
accidental death, not sufficiently notable Proudlyhumble07 08:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Would it be easier if Proudlyhumble just pointed out the few articles on Wikipedia that he actually wishes to keep? Nick mallory 09:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per likely WP:POINT nomination without prejudice for future AfD. --Charlene 10:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment ignore the un-WP:AGF allegations of 'WP:POINT' repetitively made by the above contributor.Proudlyhumble07 01:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Nominator is new editor who AfDed Ronald Goldman, Leslie Mahaffy, and almost a dozen other highly notable murder victims. Has made few edits other than AfDing victims. --Charlene 02:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I must admit, it's a bit odd for a new user (on their first day) to be so familiar with policy. - auburnpilot talk 02:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Nominator is new editor who AfDed Ronald Goldman, Leslie Mahaffy, and almost a dozen other highly notable murder victims. Has made few edits other than AfDing victims. --Charlene 02:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak delete i am going to take this as any other AfD, regardless of the possible motivation. In this particular case, there is only one RS, CBS2. If another one cannot be provided, it would not meet the regular practice here. DGG 04:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Weak delete. WP:NOT#MEMORIAL. hbdragon88 08:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep besides being a WP:POINT, the story had wide coverage Nov 18, 2003 July, 2004 Aug 14, 2006 inc. LA Times The Age NBC4 and a plaque was placed where the event occurred[1]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jayvdb (talk • contribs) 17:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC).
- Delete per WP:NOT (memorial), bio, etc... The above conflates (again) news coverage with notability. News coverage reflects notability, but does not automatically confer it. Eusebeus 15:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
