Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Manetti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep (6/2). May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Larry Manetti

His biggest claim to fame seems to be that he's Frank Sinatra's step son and that Tom Selleck likes to come over to his house, but that wasn't verified, and I don't think it's worth checking since that's probably not notable enough in itself. Delete. Karmafist 19:11, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep per http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0542027/ - OK, he's probably famous for being famous as much as anything else, but he does at least appear to have some kind of movie career. Lots of articles on Wikipedia about people with far more tenuous claims to fame than this. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 19:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep per Just zis Guy. PJM 19:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - Notable actor with supporting role in Magnum, P.I.. FCYTravis 20:25, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, cleanup and expand, as per IMDB. Carioca 21:24, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Highly doubtful that nominator did any research at all. CalJW 23:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - notable actor with a lengthy list of credits including Magnum. The article is definitely terrible and needs a complete reworking, however. 23skidoo 23:52, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. If you remove the copyvio from tv.com[1], and the unverifiable prattle, all that's left is a date "23.07.1947" with zero context--let somebody start from scratch with original, coherent, verifiable text. At a minimum it should go to Cleanup or Wikipedia:CP for a good scrubbing. 24.17.48.241 04:42, 6 November 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.