Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamez0r

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Leet. —Doug Bell ^talk 00:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lamez0r

Lamez0r (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- dictdef, nn/uncited neologism. This is not a valid speedy deletion reason. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 21:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable neologism, of no encyclopedic value.--Anthony.bradbury 22:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to leet. Danny Lilithborne 23:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Danny, the term is used and has been around for a little while. The idea that such a cretinous term could be converted into a WP article is amusing. QuagmireDog 23:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to leet - moderately used "leet" term. Torinir _{( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )} 01:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.