Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristof Walken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert ^{T | @ | C} 00:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kristof Walken

I can't find any verification of this. Seems to be part of an elaborate hoax involving the creation of articles on non-existent Christian martyrs. Included in the hoax appears to be the articles Eisaak Intelekus (deleted and protected), Paolo Rappi (speedy deleted), Borro of Arezzo, Kristof Walken, Thomas Szük (on AFD), and Langsprechenism (deleted and protected), as well as various edits to List of people burned as heretics. Responsible for this appear to be the users Pvtjoker (talk · contribs), 64.180.161.17 (talk · contribs), 24.85.192.195 (talk · contribs), 207.6.225.142 (talk · contribs), and 64.180.122.142 (talk · contribs). --u p p l a n d 07:07, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

• Burn I mean Delete. Severe problems with verifiability - no Google results see [1] No results in Google Books [2]. He gets the hat-trick with no results in Google Scholar [3] Either the Calvinist efforts to wipe him from memory have been very efficient or he didn't exist in the first place. My money's on the second option. Capitalistroadster 09:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This has to be a hoax. Bluewave 17:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as a hoax. - Bobet 18:44, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete haven't found anything verifiable either when I first looked at this article yesterday. Schutz 19:01, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. AnnH ^(talk) 23:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
• Capitalistroadster is mistaken - Walken was not killed by "Calvinists" (that's a typo), but by "Calvanists" and they have that special power of simply letting their opponents disappear. Unfortunately, they had internal squibbles and started to let themselves disappear. Because of that, every memory of them has disappeared and so should this article. Str1977 23:30, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.