Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konee Rok
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:12, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Konee Rok
Unreferenced-by-reliable-sources, promotional article -- created by its subject, natch -- of "music video & film maker". Essentially a listing of unlinked/external-linked credits -- unlinked for good reason. Speedy-tagged, but speedy tag removed --well, I'm not sure why. Calton | Talk 15:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- The initial posting of this article needed several changes to demonstrate validty and to follow wiki guidelines. Many of the links and notability points have been added and adjusted to better confirm the information and credits. Further searches and more contributers will help to improve this article. Cityvscity (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Userfy for now, let Cityvscity work on it. Actually, it would be better if Cityvscity worked on a few unrelated articles to get the hang of citations before trying to get the article back to mainspace. Speciate (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like this article had been improved upon substantially since it's inception.Larryandjai (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - reluctant, but still such a bad article, full of inline external links and unsourced assertions, that I feel it fails verifiability and reliable sources. It is not our responsibility to provide proper sourcing for this piece of self-aggrandisement. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

