Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim B. Clark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. humblefool®Deletion Reform 02:32, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kim B. Clark

Is this guy notable? Gwk 15:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep. Just saw 'this guy', Kim B. Clark on an interview on Charlie Rose on PBS. Was a superb interview. Then immediately came to Wikipedia to see what it said about him. Was very disappointed to see this *deletion* vote. Dr. Clark is definitely someone to watch. Geek84 07:40, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't a Dean of the Faculty at Harvard Business School be considered notable? Undoubtedly. sampse_1 15:33, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • I wanted to know if he's notable -I didn't say if I wanted it deleted. If anything, the article needs a rewrite. Gwk 15:36, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • I believe we agree. The article requires editing/polishing. sampse_1 15:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, notability well above the typical academic. Dcarrano 16:54, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - notable enough JoJan 18:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, yes, this individual is notable. Hall Monitor 18:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Deans of university departments are usually a step above professors in notability; most get that way by having been notable professors, or having other notable achievements in the discipline. -- BD2412 talk 18:49, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, and make into an example of a keepable academic, on the WP:PROF page. -Splash 20:20, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup focussing more on his contributions to business studies as a whole. Notable professor with number of works to his credit. Capitalistroadster 23:31, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.