Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerley's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kerley's

The subject is not that notable, and the article doesn't appear to contribute a whole lot to wikipedia. It's had a whole year to expand. - Richardcavell 02:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom/fails WP:WEB Michael 02:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: WP:WEB? Isn't this a restaurant article? —Wknight94 (talk) 02:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • No, if you click on it, you'll see it is the Wikipedia policy on irrelevant articles. Michael 02:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
    • WP:WEB is for web content. "Web content includes, but is not limited to, webcomics, podcasts, blogs, Internet forums, online magazines and other media, web portals and web hosts". This is none of those - it's a restaurant. Am I missing something? Are you thinking of WP:N in general? This seems to fall more in line with WP:CORP. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete using bait fishing sauce on your ribs is not to be recommended. Dlyons493 Talk 02:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CORP. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 05:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Possibly tasty, but definitely non-notable. dcandeto 22:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.