Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenzie Dalton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kenzie Dalton

The article is fan-cruft, and is about the member who created it. Plus the person isn't notable. That is why I am nominating it for deletion. --andrew 17:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as nonsense. Leuko 17:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. A lot of the notability is supposed to come from a relation, but the article states she's a model. Unless that can be refuted I see no reason to delete. Just a good scrub and cleanup. Badly formatted, but not fancruft and even if it was, fancruft is not a reason for speedy deletion for whoever tried to re-tag it. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'm confused. If there's an assertion to notability, then I'm just plain missing it. Sparsefarce 23:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There are a lot of people waiting tables at diners in LA claiming they are actors/actresses, but this does not make them people worthy of wiki entries. We try not to take things at face value, and facts have to be verifiable and verified per WP:V. None of the cited, including being engaged to Chad Michael Murray and participating in a CosmoGirl! modeling contest confers notability per WP:BIO. Ohconfucius 02:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Eusebeus 20:08, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete I certainly concur in Mgm's assessment that the article, even in its earliest incaranations, was not speediable; the noting of a subject's working as a fashion model with a notable publication and of a subject's being engaged to a notable individual must surely be understood as a proper assertion of notability. I vacillate on the notability by familial relation question but here think Mgm to be quite right that Dalton qua fiancée of Chad Michael Murray is non-notable; I don't, though, think Dalton qua model to be notable per WP:BIO, although I think it to be eminently likely that further and more prominent modelling work (especially that for which sources might be found) would confer notability. In any event, it should be emphasized that, to my mind, the disposition of the question is not wholly clear, such that intimations of speediability are, IMHO, unfounded. Joe 04:29, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, good call! Mallanox 19:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.