The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Bucketsofg 02:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
unencyclopedic and not really important article. editors POV, deleting others edits,and references dont have proof of arguments Askbeth 01:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Well referenced article on an apparently notable subject. I can't see what is unencyclopedic about it. If there are issues with the content bring them up on the talk page or a RfC, don't try and delete the article. --Daniel J. Leivick 01:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.