Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kat Swift

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Coredesat 08:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kat Swift

Kat Swift (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable, no reliable sources Southern Texas 04:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Only if more sources are given. She seems to be a candidate in the 2008 United States presidential election which I would think would make her notable given she has a history of campaigning in different elections. If reliable sources can be found, I would say she could meet the notablity guideline. — Save_Us_229 05:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: Needs sources. I'm assuming she actually is going to run for president, as it says she has announced her intention. I think that makes somebody notable. - Rjd0060 05:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Being a prominent member of a prominent political party in the USA is cleary notable, especially given presidential candidate aspect. More sources will naturally exist. The fact that the article is in its infant stages does not affect the notability of the subject. Jdcooper 05:47, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. She is considered a "generally recognized candidate" for the Green Party nomination by the California Secretary of State so she will be on the Green Party presidential primary ballot in California. [1] However, the article needs some independent sources regarding her presidential campaign. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep agree with jdcooper. Doc Strange 07:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep probably notable enough without the Presidential campaign. MLA 11:51, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per Metropolitan.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - needs a general overhaul. Could assert some notability, however, if there is no notability after the election period, delete. Rudget zŋ 17:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.