Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl W. Richter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash^talk 23:45, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Karl W. Richter

Non notable? Andy Mabbett 14:40, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep with cleanup: going by Google hits, looks reasonably notable. But the fannish tone needs neutralising. Tearlach 12:29, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Never heard of the fellow myself but there seems to be a goodly amount of unique Google hits on him, not to mention at least one (possibly two?) books have been written about him. Passes the notability bar for me, but needs definitely cleanup and wikifying. 23skidoo 04:08, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There are only 56 unique Google hits for every single "Karl W. Richter" who has ever existed in the world. User:Zoe|^(talk) 07:40, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Comment: yes, but only a minority of sites use his middle initial. A Google on "Karl Richter" MiG gets over 2500 hits, mostly about him. Tearlach 12:29, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, no indication of notability in the article. Martg76 22:28, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.