Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kam Tse Tsuen Aubeck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Bobet 21:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kam Tse Tsuen Aubeck

This subject does not obviously meet WP:BIO though his latest civil service posting may come close. As it stands it has WP:NPOV and WP:VANITY concerns as well, but those can be addressed if he is found to be notable. Eluchil404 21:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete because he does not have any sources to cite and fails WP:BIO rules about being notable. I think that Eluchil404 is right and it's just vanity. Allisonmontgomery69 22:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's clearly vanity and I see no assertion of notability perWP:BIO. --Wine Guy Talk 17:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• delete A resume and press release concatenated into an article. Sanbeg 16:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.