Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KH Experience

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] KH Experience

Advertising for non-notable Kingdom Hearts II fangame that fails WP:WEB. The article itself also incorporates some kind of guestbook feature, which violates WP:NOT. Originally prodded by me, deprodded by anon editor. Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Zos 03:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. No assertion of notability, and "kh experience" has 157 Google results, almost all of which are unrelated. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

this is not a game but a series. This page gives information on characters in the serieplease do not delete it! I am begging you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.120.160.42 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. As per... I'll leave that for you to decide -_- --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 03:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 03:37, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and do not speedy. Games/series do not fit any WP:CSD criterion.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it's kinda sad when people beg. Danny Lilithborne 05:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The anonymous editors might want to try deal with the issues at hand, rather than begging. Tychocat 08:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

No delete. It's not a fan made game its a forum, are you blind!? It's an RPG so what?

• Delete, as forums are also generally non-notable. --Habap 14:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

You guys are enough to drive the most polite man insane! First you delete KHIH then KH3:AoD and now KH Experience, whats wrong with you- Darkside 597

• Delete. Darkside597, did you read the guidelines SCZenz linked to on your talk page? —Caesura^(t) 16:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.