Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius von Brunk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 15:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Julius von Brunk
Flashcruft, newgrounds spam. Fails WP:BIO. Not even the internet-biased google test helps him: 143 hits for "Julius von Brunk". Original research, WP:VERIFY, no reliable sources and WP:VANITY. Was previously AFDed and deleted as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron von Brunk. Quote from the article: 'he's often referred on the internet world [sic] as "Baron von Brunk"' - GHits 282 (Baron von Brunk is a redirect here). Basically, this a grand slam of everything that shouldn't be on Wikipedia. My choice: Delete and prevent recreation of "Julius von Brunk" and "Baron von Brunk". - Motor (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as repost if it indeed is a repost, otherwise delete as vanity page per nom. Kimchi.sg 17:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable animator. Leave open for recreation if he attains notability. --Billpg 19:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- The page is quite different from Baron von Brunk; at least, there was an attempt to write it in an encyclopedic style. However, it still fails to establish notability. Delete - possibly a speedy deletion candidate as vanity. - Mike Rosoft 20:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity, not notable and fails to meet the requirements for WP:BIO--Auger Martel 12:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
