Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph D. Selby
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Joseph D. Selby
I just don't see anything in the current article that makes this individual worthy of a Wikipedia entry. It doesn't have inline sources and I do not agree that members of state legislature alone qualify for inclusion. Fresh 13:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: Unfortunately, WP:BIO disagrees with you: "A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards ... Politicians who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislatures." RGTraynor 13:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Per the above, he would have needed to be a member of a statewide office. As he only represents one small portion of the state, in the state (as opposed to nationally for a member of the House), I am not sure this policy applies. Per WP:BIO, "Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability."--Fresh 15:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:BIO as a past member of a state legislature. DarkAudit 14:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I would class a state government as local goverment (as opposed to national goverment). Apart from BLD (Birth, Life & Death), what has he done of note to warrant his own article. -- Rehnn83 Talk 15:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Classify it however you please, but being a member of a state legislature is an explicit prima facie pass on WP:BIO. I agree that automatic notability of state reps from a state three-quarters the population of the city of Boston is a bit Grand Fenwickian, but this isn't the place to debate the validity of WP:BIO. RGTraynor 16:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, explicitly passes WP:BIO. Fresh, if you don't agree with the guideline, head on over to Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) and enjoy yourself to the utmost. But here we generally go by what the guidelines already say, because they represent a wide consensus. --Dhartung | Talk 17:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out, I wasn't sure if a state position was considered notable.--Fresh 19:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as a former member of a state legislature as per WP:BIO. Davewild 17:37, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:BIO, easy one. Carlossuarez46 18:35, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
