Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José + 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect. — Edward Z. Yang(Talk) 23:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] José + 10

This is an article about one commercial spot. We are being overly enthusiastic by including this. I mean, it was a decent spot, but there are very few advertising campaigns that have made it onto WP, and the ones that did (e.g. Budweiser Frogs, Got Milk?) were decade-long cultural institutions with many iterations. This is just one spot. Delete- CrazyRougeian talk/email 23:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep - This ad was a global ad being shown in most markets, for one of the biggest events on Earth. It has spawned a "Making of" video showing how players from a previous generation were combined with current-generation players, and how all the current generation players were brought together. -- Jeff3000 00:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I think it's more accurate to describe this as a series of spots than just a single ad. It was a cute series that I enjoyed seeing between matches, and I wouldn't mind seeing it here, but I understand skepticism about its notability. Neutral for now. HumbleGod 01:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Adidas and trim down, most of the text is already there. -- Koffieyahoo 02:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Adidas, notable ad in the scope of the company, but it doesn't extend into or create it's own realm of independent notability. The necessary text is on Adidas and should be there on it's own for now. Yanksox 02:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect per above. — RJH (talk) 17:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- This ad was pretty famous. Wikipedia is a large one, I think it might not be big enough in the USA, but people, Wikipedia is not a USA-encyclopedia. Just because you dont watch soccer doesnt mean others dont. -Juan
    • Hush, anon, don't make assumptions! I saw every game except those on Saturdays! - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep- It's still airing, after the World Cup, and despite being a small part; it's still a part of footballing and popular culture. - -- partipo 22:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC-5)
  • Keep- As for me, I don't even know what is 'Got Milk?'... Keep this ad as it funny, smart and was a world(minus us)-wide success. JeDi 12:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
    • The ad was shown in the U.S. as much as anywhere else. Stop making this into some sort of U.S.-centric thing! - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Hey man, you are not telling me what I saw and what I didn't. I don't know what is 'Got milk', and I think this article about 'Jose+10' shall be part of wikipedia. Period.JeDi 18:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
        • Oooh, a threat! I find threats sexy! - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
          • A Threat? You seem a little bit hysterical. Anyway, please inform us why you want to delete this article. Just to remind you some AfD policy: Good arguments for deletion are: "unverifiable" (violates WP:V), "original research" (violates WP:OR), and "non-notable" (for example, for a person, does not meet WP:BIO). The argument "non-neutral point of view" (violates WP:NPOV) is often used, but often such articles can be salvaged, so this is not a very strong reason for deletion. The reason "unencyclopedic" is not an argument at all but just another way of saying "should be deleted". [1].JeDi 19:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
            • That would be, non-notable'. That, and the article shall be deleted. Period. And I was not being hysterical. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
              • Ok. This ad is notable. I didn't discovered it on TV but someone told me about it. I then downloaded it on Internet, and saw it several times on TV. I talked about it with friends, I looked on internet about the making-of, and I really enjoyed it. Like it or not, it is now part of pop culture. I understand when ask me not to make it a U.S.-centric thing, but I'm sorry, you think this ad is not notable? I guess it's because you live in a country where the World Cup and all its feria didn't make it. If now I put an AfD on Got milk, how would you react? I really don't know Got milk, and I don't care. It was not shown anywhere else, not in my country at least, but I can understand that it is "important" for you to have it on Wikipedia. [[2]]JeDi 20:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Adidas. ed g2s • talk 22:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Adidas. Wikipedia is not a list of every advert anyone found entertaining. If you really liked, start a freaking blog about it. -- GWO
  • Merge with Adidas. Ad is notable in the context of an Adidas campaign but it did not achieve enough notability on its own to merit an article for itself.Agne27 05:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Adidas. If you look at the adidas page you already see all the players mentioned there. Whata joke it is to keep it up when you've got everything this page features. There is no point in keeping an article like this. None! Soxrock 21:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.