Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joncourt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. — FireFox • T [21:32, 6 April 2006]

[edit] Joncourt

I removed the prod and fixed the article. Are you suppose to put it up for AfD? My vote is Keep--Rayc 05:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, and no, you don't need to place this on AfD, unless of course someone contests your removal of the prod tag. --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per TBC.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdxiang (talk • contribs)

I verify this fact--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 ^(Talk)Contributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep, I believe we can close this AFD by now. Like TBC said, you don't need to place this on AFD unless an editor contests the removal of the prod tag. This town exists, definitely notable. --Terence Ong 09:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep I put the prod tag on it. It still needs more work, it's barely more than a substub at the moment, but I'm happy for it to be kept in its new state. --Tango 12:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep wrong tag.  : ) 69.64.140.71 17:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, mistaken nomination. Fagstein 17:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.