Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolly Roger (frog)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 02:53, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jolly Roger (frog)

Non-notable character for a video game that doesn't even have a article Delete --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. --Hetar 03:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Alba 04:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn character. --Terence Ong 04:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The game's name is misspelled in the article; it's actually Banjo-Tooie, which does have an article. Nonetheless, this is not sufficiently notable or have such a huge section in the main game's article to warrant its own. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge & Delete Merge relevant data (if any) with the main article for Banjo-Tooie. Bejnar 05:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Banjo-Tooie. Does not deserve its own article. JIP | Talk 08:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to barely notable video game article. Plus, it's not a (frog) but a (video game character). ProhibitOnions 10:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge all fictional stubs like this -- Astrokey44|talk 11:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, the game's article already has more information than this one on the subject. No point to a spin-off article if it's going to have less topical content than the main article. Kuru ^talk 02:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge look up. Newyorktimescrossword 07:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.