Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jewbuntu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jewbuntu

Jewbuntu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

An unreleased fork of Ubuntu. No reliable sources describing it appear to exist; as far as I can tell, this is more or less a joke. Zetawoof(ζ) 22:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Oy vey! The Jewbuntu web site is just a logo, undoubtedly a hoax --Steve (Slf67) talk 01:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Circumcise per nom. --Dhartung | Talk 02:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously a joke. Only a matter of time before someone edits "linux for jewish beings" to "Linux for subhuman beings" Achilles2.0 03:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Even if it would be real, this level of forking would not warrant an another article in my opinion. (FWIW there's "Christian" forks of Linux distros that basically are identical to normal distros but happen to install GnomeSword by default - maybe, just maybe, have a different default background image...) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
    • You mean like Ubuntu Christian Edition? Zetawoof(ζ) 19:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
      • Yeah, something similar. That particular article sounds strongly like a merge/trim candidate - there's dozens of small forks of major distributions where the primary difference is the apps that get installed by default. (I'm not objecting to forks in general, however; Ubuntu itself is a fork of Debian, but they've done considerably more work than just tweaking the default install, namely, developed new software, new release processes, and have developer commitment of major scale.) Jewbuntu, however, appears to be on even shakier ground - there's nothing that indicates that it even exists, really... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Maybe some day this will require a page, but not before it's released. - Peregrine Fisher 21:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I searched google for media mentions etc. Found nothing. Thus fails WP:RS and WP:WEB. --Quirex 21:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.