Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Ramey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Peacent 03:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Jeremy Ramey
Article was proposed by another editor for speedy deletion (article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject) - which was contested --VS talk 22:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, No references to claims made in article. Poorly written. Needs to state the facts and not write it like it was a novel. As written it seams as a vanity piece since the writer is the subject of the article, if it had been written in a more neutral tone, I would of overlooked it, but it isn't so it does seam to be WP:COI. Callelinea 22:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A freestyle skateboarder of his stature would have some Google hits. Ramey does not. Adding a blocking phrase to weed out Wikipedia mirrors, we get: [1] - Richfife 23:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment He is listed at Freestyle skateboarding on wiki as a notable freestyle skater. I found nothing substantial anywhere else, however. --Stormbay 23:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- An anonymous user added his name (and a lot of others) to the list last year. Not a reliable source, and Wikipedia articles can't be used as sources for other Wikipedia articles, so... the quest continues. - Richfife 23:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Richfife and I know what is considered a legitimate source. The point simply was that the article in question calls him notable with no apparent disagreement from anyone. Someone may even want to remove the name from the article when this one is deleted or footnote it to point out that he is not not notable enough to have his own article in wiki. --Stormbay 01:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- An anonymous user added his name (and a lot of others) to the list last year. Not a reliable source, and Wikipedia articles can't be used as sources for other Wikipedia articles, so... the quest continues. - Richfife 23:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom and Richfife. 19:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
