Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan-Bouke Jeeninga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 05:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Jan-Bouke Jeeninga

Vanity. Ifnord 14:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

• Contrary to what some people say, the Mischief Masters, Jordy and Jan-bouke do exist and therefor deserve a spot in the Wikipedia. The Mischief Masters haven't reached national fame yet, but they're working very hard to do so by producing products like their movie A New Master. People who don't believe it should check their IMDB page. For further proof they could look at the biggest Dutch DVD site DVD-home since they devoted a artikel to the Masters. Doubters will see for themselves that there IS a movie made. The page is written in Dutch, but does contain screenshots. I do agree that there isn't a Mischeif Masters series since there is only one movie made with a second production coming. The url to the article mentioned: http://www.dvd-home.nl/nieuws/oud2004.htm#8 The Masters are displayed just above the "Augustus" (August) banner. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unstoppableforce (talk • contribs) User has 4 contributions, 3 for these AFDs
  • “...Jordy and Jan-bouke do exist and therefore deserve a spot in the Wikipedia.” Hmmm... I exist too, so I suppose that means that I “deserve” a spot in the Wikipedia. Would someone please write an article about me? Out of modesty, I won’t write it myself. ♠DanMS 16:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; the IMDb entry is for one self-produced apparently unreleased short of the sort likely filmed on a mass-market camcorder. Also, existence is not an assertion of notability. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 15:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Tonywalton  | Talk 16:37, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. To repeat what I said in the AfD for the article on his colleague: I'm sure the movie exists, I just don't think it's particularly significant in the grand scale of things. Neither, by extension, is the guy who made it. Just because it's verifiably out there, doesn't mean it matters to a significant portion of the world at large. That's not an insult, that's just a simple fact. -- Captain Disdain 20:34, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Lomn. I'm sure they exist and all, but self-producing a film is not something that warrants an article. They should spend efforts on getting it released and making a national name for themselves before returning to Wikipedia for an article. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:20, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable person and film Bwithh 08:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.