Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Isaac Conde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as a non-notable bio. JDoorjam Talk 16:22, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Jamie Isaac Conde

Jamie Isaac Conde (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Prod was contested, so I'm moving this to AfD. Non-notable person, probably vanity. Aecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 09:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Being the son of famous parents does not confer notability. Neither does appearing once on a magazine cover. Kimchi.sg 09:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - might deserve mention in e.g. parent's article, but not enough here for individual notability. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 09:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Jayden54 10:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with parents. As far as I know that is the common practice with non-notable children. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this article dosen't really demonstrate that this person is significant on some way. Atlantis Hawk 10:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 13:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I agree with all above. (Anonymous user) 22:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.53.208.231 (talk • contribs)
• 'Delete'Non-notable person vanity entry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.155.1.3 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.