Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James W. Sperman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Waltontalk 16:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James W. Sperman

James W. Sperman (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Autobiographical article, notability doesn't meet level of WP:BIO. RJASE1 Talk 17:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Relevant information is already summarized at Pink Taco, and many of the sources in this article have little to do with him. We don't need both Pink Taco and this article; I'd keep the other one and delete this one. MastCell Talk 23:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Sperman's restaurant has nothing to do with Morton's Pink Taco restaurant. The connection between the two restaurants is original research, and all references to Sperman's restaurant have already, appropriately, been removed from Pink Taco. Pan Dan 14:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Please consider my suggestion at Talk:Pink_Taco#original_pink_taco as an alternative to deletion. Pan Dan 09:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per MastCell. Alternative doesn't make sense: we don't need more than one Pink Taco Article. Also, given the username, there is likely a WP:COI issue here. Savidan 15:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Because Sperman's restaurant has nothing to do with Morton's, we need two Pink Taco articles if Sperman's restaurant is notable. Do you think it is? Pan Dan 14:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Move to userspace The original pink taco has serious claims to notability, as evidenced by the sources found in this article. Please see Talk:Pink_Taco#original_pink_taco, as User:Pan Dan suggested for the proposed resolution of the two Pink Tacos. I will be editing the original pink taco article and basing it off of the sources and prose provided here. Copysan 21:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete does not meet WP:BIO.Mmoneypenny 21:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Whether Sperman meets WP:BIO is not at issue here because no one claims that he does. The question is the notability of his restaurant. Pan Dan 14:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment No one recommending deletion has addressed the central question of whether Sperman's restaurant is notable. Pan Dan 14:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the information, which seems notable because of the documented state and national controversy. Merge, split, move or whatever as necessary. --Rbraunwa 14:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per MastCell. Fails WP:BIO - G1ggy Talk/Contribs 22:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
    • The article is about a restaurant, not M. Sperman, so WP:BIO is irrelevant. Broken Record 12:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BIO, WP:N, and WP:COI. ♠TomasBat 22:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Pink Taco. (If that gets deleted....*shrug*.)--Mike18xx 09:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Sperman's Pink Taco restaurant has nothing to do with the Pink Taco restaurant that is described at Pink Taco, so a merge is contraindicated. Broken Record 12:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 16:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.