Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Traub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Coredesat 05:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Traub

James Traub (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete he writes for a newspaper, so he gets published, but what is published about him is the measure of notability; his books rank #27,916, #1,435,411, and apparently not available at Amazon, nn. so nn. we don't know where or when he was born. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep we dont go by amazon rank--and if we did, actually 27,916 overall on amazon is very respectable. Remember, this is all time sales there ever for any book. At least 6 books, dozens of stories as important writer for two major magazines: "a newspaper" and the New Yorker. "the Best Intentions" has review in at least 5 major publications, and might be notable as well. interviews, etc etc. I'm sure we'd find the vital stats too. Amazon has the top hits in a google search under his name, but we know that's doesnt mean much--there's usually a good deal more after that. DGG (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per DGG. --Storkk (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per rationale by DGG, and well, because he meets BIO guideline. Keeper | 76 20:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.